A Few Things
Posted by Mark Alders on Saturday, December 3, 2011
Under: competition
Today's butt! What a beauty! You could get lost in it for days LOL!
Okay, a few things today. First, there is a funny! Again, with some 'porn faces' you just can't resist placing a joke or two in to the picture as well. *giggle* I couldn't help myself with this one!

Now, the winner of the Christmas competition is....(chosen at random using comment randomiser) Sara S! Sarah, contact me by commenting on the blog or sending me an email (I will need your email address. You have won a copy of A Human for Christmas when it's released on the 15th! Congratulations.
I was going to post a picture today which would launch my next competition. It was going to be a "Think up a Caption for This" kind of thing. Unfortunately, when I looked at the picture in detail, there was an exposed peen in it! A nice one, yes, but a peen nevertheless. Now, I have made it a rule on this blog/site not to post peen. What do you all think of that? Should there be peen, in an artistic, non porn way, posted?
While on the subject of images, I have been starting gallerys of photographs I have accumulated over the years in the My Droolings section and they will be updated on a regularish basis. Did you want a gallery of nude models showing peen there? I have a massive collection of nudes from hunks to twinks all showing their best bits. Okay, a lot more twinks than hunks, but hey, this is me we're talking about. *giggle*
Which brings me to a pet peeve when it comes to photographers/studios photographing intact men. Why must you insist they flaccid retract? WHY? I don't see the need. Plenty of European sites keep their gentlemen un-retracted, flaccid or otherwise. Why must sites based in America force their models to flaccid retract? The foreskin is a beautiful and functional part of the male penis. I am so going to start a letter campaign:
Dear studio [insert name here] Your site features many wonderful men in all their glory. But please, if your models are intact, possess foreskin, have a hood, or aren't circumcised, can you cocking well stop forcing them to flaccid retract! If they've got foreskin, fucking well show it. Do you know why Euro porn is so popular? Do you? It's because they have models who don't retract, flaccid or otherwise. Get with the program. Yours, Mark Alders, intactivist and m/m erotica writer
Anyway, enough of my little rant. I decided to use another picture for you all to caption. For the best 'caption' I will give a prize :)

Talk to you later :)
Okay, a few things today. First, there is a funny! Again, with some 'porn faces' you just can't resist placing a joke or two in to the picture as well. *giggle* I couldn't help myself with this one!

Now, the winner of the Christmas competition is....(chosen at random using comment randomiser) Sara S! Sarah, contact me by commenting on the blog or sending me an email (I will need your email address. You have won a copy of A Human for Christmas when it's released on the 15th! Congratulations.
I was going to post a picture today which would launch my next competition. It was going to be a "Think up a Caption for This" kind of thing. Unfortunately, when I looked at the picture in detail, there was an exposed peen in it! A nice one, yes, but a peen nevertheless. Now, I have made it a rule on this blog/site not to post peen. What do you all think of that? Should there be peen, in an artistic, non porn way, posted?
While on the subject of images, I have been starting gallerys of photographs I have accumulated over the years in the My Droolings section and they will be updated on a regularish basis. Did you want a gallery of nude models showing peen there? I have a massive collection of nudes from hunks to twinks all showing their best bits. Okay, a lot more twinks than hunks, but hey, this is me we're talking about. *giggle*
Which brings me to a pet peeve when it comes to photographers/studios photographing intact men. Why must you insist they flaccid retract? WHY? I don't see the need. Plenty of European sites keep their gentlemen un-retracted, flaccid or otherwise. Why must sites based in America force their models to flaccid retract? The foreskin is a beautiful and functional part of the male penis. I am so going to start a letter campaign:
Dear studio [insert name here] Your site features many wonderful men in all their glory. But please, if your models are intact, possess foreskin, have a hood, or aren't circumcised, can you cocking well stop forcing them to flaccid retract! If they've got foreskin, fucking well show it. Do you know why Euro porn is so popular? Do you? It's because they have models who don't retract, flaccid or otherwise. Get with the program. Yours, Mark Alders, intactivist and m/m erotica writer
Anyway, enough of my little rant. I decided to use another picture for you all to caption. For the best 'caption' I will give a prize :)

Talk to you later :)
In : competition
blog comments powered by Disqus
I am Mark Alders, writer, intactivist, post office worker, and all round nice guy...except when someone steals my chocolate!

.jpg?timestamp=1335257790529)